Medicare Blog

how would medicare for all impact unemployment

by Audra Littel Published 2 years ago Updated 1 year ago
image

Medicare for All would boost wages, expand workers’ options, and likely create jobs A new report from EPI research director Josh Bivens finds that Medicare for All would bolster the labor market, strengthen economic security for millions of U.S. households, and would likely boost the number of jobs in the U.S. labor market.

Full Answer

How will Medicare for all impact healthcare industry professionals?

If Medicare for All becomes the new American healthcare system, many healthcare industry professionals could face major changes. The impact of Medicare for All on private insurance companies would be the most drastic, aggressive change by far.

Will Medicare for all increase the number of jobs?

Like all positive productivity gains, Medicare for All would be more likely to increase the total number of jobs in the U.S. economy, even as health reform leads to the redeployment of workers from some sectors and into others.

Could Medicare for all help with job losses and transitions?

Medicare for All could make job losses and transitions less stressful by delinking employment and access to health insurance, emulating the universal access to health care offered by our rich country peers. The U. S.

What would be the negative impact of Medicare for all?

However, a negative impact of Medicare for All would be that a single-payer system would almost certainly decrease profit margins of hospitals across the country.

image

How would Medicare for all impact the economy?

Emergency expansion of Medicare, to Medicare for All, would also be a huge economic stimulus. The elimination of co-insurance, deductibles, co-pays, and out-of-pockets would be an economic shot in the arm for all working families, both employed and unemployed.

What are the downsides of Medicare for All?

Cons of Medicare for All:Providers can choose only private pay options unless mandated differently.Doesn't solve the shortage of doctors.Health insurance costs may not disappear.Requires a tax increase.Shifts costs of employer coverage.

How would universal healthcare affect the economy?

With government borrowing, universal health care could shrink the economy by as much as 24% by 2060, as investments in private capital are reduced.

How would Medicare for all affect healthcare workers?

The Truth of What Medicare for All Means for You: Under Medicare for All, “the number of registered nurse graduates will decline by more than 25% and the entire nurse workforce will shrink by 1.2 million registered nurses by 2050 relative to current projections,” according to the issue brief.

What are the pros and cons of universal health care?

Here are a few pros and cons of universal healthcare.PRO: Make It Easier for Patients to Seek Treatment. ... CON: Doctors Have Less Flexibility in Negotiating Rates. ... Must Read: What Does Universal Healthcare Means for Medical Practices. ... PRO: It Could Increase Demand for Medical Services.More items...

What are the advantages and disadvantages of Medicare for All?

Though Medicare for All would likely lower the healthcare costs in the economy overall and increase quality care while also facilitating more preventative care to avoid expensive emergency room visits, you could end up paying more if you make more than $250,000 a year or are in the top 0.1 % of households.

What would happen if we had free healthcare?

Most agree that if we had universal healthcare in America, we could save lives. A study from Harvard researchers states that not having healthcare causes around 44,789 deaths per year. 44,789 deaths per year means that there is a 40% increased risk of death for people who are uninsured.

How does unemployment affect health care?

Consistent with previous literature on unemployment and health services,2,37 job loss was statistically associated with the increased risk of unmet health care needs. Findings further suggest that job loss may have a greater influence on health care needs for those with a higher income.

How universal healthcare would benefit the US?

Universal healthcare would free small business owners from having to provide coverage while simultaneously enhancing the freedom of the worker. Lifespans could be longer, people could be happier and healthier in systems that are simpler and more affordable.

How do physicians feel about Medicare for All?

In 2020, the American College of Physicians and the Society of General Internal Medicine went a step further, endorsing both public option and single-payer reforms. Yet, physician opinion on Medicare for All remains split, with most doctors concerned that such reform might decrease their income.

Do doctors want universal healthcare?

The poll of 1,306 healthcare professionals found that 49% of physicians agree with the Medicare for All concept, 47% of nurses and advanced practice registered nurses favor it, followed by 41% of those in health business/administration and 40% of pharmacists.

How would a single-payer system affect doctors?

A single-payer system would result in one set of patient treatment guidelines, which might reduce doctors administrative burden, but authorizations from Medicare may still be required for some nonstandard treatments or drugs.

How much does Medicare cover?

On average, Medicare pays for only about 65 percent of an enrollee’s total health expenses, while the new program would cover nearly 100 percent of those costs. Half (51 percent) of Medicare households include no workers (essentially, these are fully retired people).

What percentage of Americans would be worse off under Medicare for All?

Most Americans—73.5 percent —would be financially worse off under “Medicare for All,” a government-run universal health care system. All workers would pay a 21.2 percent payroll tax in addition to current taxes, in order to fund the massive increase in spending under a government-run system.

How much would the higher payroll tax rate increase?

Applying the higher federal payroll tax rate to the higher taxable wage base would increase their federal payroll tax bill by $14,198. Because more of their income is subject to tax, they would also pay an additional $1,414 in federal income taxes and lose all $1,172 of their earned income credit.

What is the payroll tax rate for most workers?

Workers would have to pay additional taxes—21.2 percent of all wage and salary income—raising the total federal payroll tax rate to 36.5 percent for most workers. Average disposable income (after taxes and private medical expenses) for all households would decline by $5,671 per year.

How does Medicare for All harm working Americans?

How “Medicare for All” Harms Working Americans. Proposals to impose a government-run health care system , such as the pending “Medicare for All” legislation, on the American public would leave most households financially worse off. Workers would have to pay additional taxes—21.2 percent of all wage and salary income—raising ...

How much disposable income would an unmarried mother have?

An unmarried mother covered by employer-sponsored insurance, with two children covered by CHIP, and with cash income near the median for all such families (about $31,000), would have $1,547 less in disposable income under a government-run health care program.

How much disposable income would a married couple with two children have?

A married couple with two children and cash income near the median for all such families (about $98,000), and covered by employer-sponsored insurance, would have $9,021 less in disposable income under a government-run health care program.

ECONOMIC SHOT IN THE ARM

Emergency expansion of Medicare, to Medicare for All, would also be a huge economic stimulus. The elimination of co-insurance, deductibles, co-pays, and out-of-pockets would be an economic shot in the arm for all working families, both employed and unemployed.

BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR

Give $10 a month or more and get our "Fight the Boss, Build the Union" T-shirt.

What the Pandemic Reveals About Our Health Care System

Nothing like a pandemic to reveal the shortcomings of our for-profit, employment-based health care system that treats health care as a commodity for sale in the marketplace rather than as a public good.

What would the adoption of a reform like M4A require?

The grain of truth in some of the claims is that, like any productivity improvement, the adoption of a reform like M4A would require the redeployment of workers from one sector (the health insurance and medical billing complex) to other sectors (mostly the delivery of health care).

What is the job challenge of health reform?

The job challenge relating to a fundamental health reform is managing a relatively small increase in job churn during an initial phase-in period. Most Medicare for All plans explicitly recognize and account for the costs of providing these workers the elements of a just transition.

How does health reform affect the labor market?

workers. The most obvious benefits would be higher wages and salaries, increased availability of good jobs , reduced stress during spells of job loss, better “matches” between workers and employers, ...

Is M4A a large churn?

Relative to the scale of other gross measures of job churn, the churn associated with M4A is not large. It is true that one source of cost savings from the introduction of M4A is the reduced demand for insurance and billing administration. In turn, this reduced demand would shift employment out of these sectors.

How much would health insurance premiums double in 10 years?

If health insurance premiums rose by 7% per year, they would double in 10 years. If growth of other forms of compensation remained flat, this would lead to the share of health insurance premiums in total compensation doubling in 10 years.

How does public spending affect aggregate demand?

All else equal, more public spending will boost aggregate demand and create jobs, while higher taxes will reduce aggregate demand and restrain job growth. Further, the progressivity of taxes used to finance fundamental health reform will also condition its effect on aggregate demand.

How does Medicare for All affect wages?

Higher cash wages and salaries. Medicare for All could increase wages and salaries for U.S. workers by reducing employers’ costs for health insurance—freeing up fiscal space to invest in wages instead.

What would happen if Medicare for All became the new American healthcare system?

If Medicare for All becomes the new American healthcare system, many healthcare industry professionals could face major changes.

How much more do private insurers pay than Medicare?

Private insurers pay around 100-200 percent more than Medicare pays for the same services and treatments, so eliminating this sector of the American healthcare industry would greatly affect hospital profits. This is a problem because hospitals often use excess funds to invest in healthcare innovations.

How does Medicare for All affect hospitals?

One positive impact of Medicare for All would be that hospitals are guaranteed payment under a single-payer system. This would be especially beneficial to hospitals in rural communities that often serve larger ...

What percentage of Americans are covered by private insurance?

Many of the proposed Medicare for All bills advocate for a complete elimination of private insurers. According to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation, 56 percent of Americans are covered by private insurance, 36 percent are covered by government-funded insurance, and about 9 percent of Americans are currently uninsured.

Why is it bad for doctors to have less money?

However, if physician salaries are affected at all by a shift to a single-payer system, it would be the result of shrinking long-term pay raises rather than direct salary reductions.

Is Medicare for All a single payer system?

There are currently dozens of proposed bills floating around Congress which would attempt to move the United States closer (if not fully) to a single-payer healthcare system. Most bills fall under the umbrella of Medicare for All and share the commonality of providing healthcare coverage for every single American.

Who is Kayla Pearce?

Kayla Pearce. Kayla Pearce is a Content Developer at Medicare World in Memphis, TN. She has backgrounds in professional and creative writing and over a decade of experience in research and editing. She is deeply interested in literature, poetry, cats, and dessert.

What percentage of Americans support Medicare for All?

A Kaiser Family Foundation tracking poll published in November 2019 shows public perception of Medicare for All shifts depending on what detail they hear. For instance 53 percent of adults overall support Medicare for All and 65 percent support a public option. Among Democrats, specifically, 88 percent support a public option while 77 percent want ...

What would happen if we eliminated all private insurance and gave everyone a Medicare card?

“If we literally eliminate all private insurance and give everyone a Medicare card, it would probably be implemented by age groups ,” Weil said.

What is single payer healthcare?

Single-payer is an umbrella term for multiple approaches.

What is the idea of Medicare for All?

Ask someone what they think about the idea of “Medicare for All” — that is, one national health insurance plan for all Americans — and you’ll likely hear one of two opinions: One , that it sounds great and could potentially fix the country’s broken healthcare system.

How many people in the US are without health insurance?

The number of Americans without health insurance also increased in 2018 to 27.5 million people, according to a report issued in September by the U.S. Census Bureau. This is the first increase in uninsured people since the ACA took effect in 2013.

Does Jayapal bill cover out of pocket costs?

The Jayapal bill fully prohibits all cost-sharing. The Sanders bill allows for very limited out-of-pocket costs of up to $200 per year for prescription drugs, but that doesn’t apply to individuals or families with an income under 200 percent of the federal poverty level.

Is Medicare for All funded by the government?

In Jayapal’s bill, for instance, Medicare for All would be funded by the federal government, using money that otherwise would go to Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal programs that pay for health services. But when you get right down to it, the funding for all the plans comes down to taxes.

How many hours do you have to work to get medicaid in Georgia?

AHH: Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) has proposed a limited expansion of Medicaid that would require that beneficiaries work, volunteer or job train for 80 hours a month to qualify for coverage.

What committee is examining the e-cigarette scam?

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee holds a hearing on the response to lung illnesses and youth e-cigarette use on Nov. 13. SUGAR RUSH.

Does Kemp's 1115 waiver apply to Medicaid?

Kemp has called full expansion a “risky one-size-fits-all that costs too much.” "Kemp’s alternative, known as an 1115 waiver, takes aim at some of the state’s poorest residents: the 408,000 or so adult Georgians who make less than the federal poverty level — about $12,000 a year for an individual — but do not qualify for Medicaid," they add.

Who stopped Vincristine?

— In a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, government accountability advocacy group Restore Public Trust urged him to intervene in the decision by Teva Pharmaceuticals to stop producing cancer treatment Vincristine.

How much will M4A reduce healthcare spending?

He begins with the projection by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that personal healthcare spending will reach $3.86 trillion by 2022 and calculates that M4A would reduce national healthcare spending by about $93 billion annually. This figure comprises:

What are the benefits of Medicare for All?

'Medicare for All': What would it really mean for healthcare stakeholders? 1 Although “Medicare for All” could reduce personal healthcare spending and administrative costs, overall government spending could increase significantly after accounting for costs currently borne by employers and individuals under commercial plans. 2 Hospitals in high-cost markets could struggle to make up for the loss of commercial insurance payments that amount to several times more than what Medicare pays for the same service. 3 Physicians would face increasing financial pressure to seek employment with hospitals, and the physician shortage would be exacerbated given the likelihood of greater demand for healthcare services under universal coverage.

What does M4A mean?

What M4A might really mean: A working premise. In this article, we assume “Medicare for All” means exactly that — Medicare for everyone — but with important clarifications: Because Medicare coverage would be made available to all citizens, it would replace Medicaid and each state’s portion of funding for Medicaid.

Why are Americans interested in healthcare reform?

Another survey indicates the underlying reason for Americans’ interest in healthcare reform: 77% are concerned that rising healthcare costs will cause significant and lasting damage to the U.S. economy, and 45% believe a major health event could leave them bankrupt, according to a 2019 Westhealth/Gallup survey.

Is M4A a two tier system?

M4A thus could be the harbinger of a true two-tiered healthcare system: one privately paid for by the relatively few consumers who can afford it, the other a much larger and perhaps much less appealing system for the majority.

Is M4A good for health plans?

Overall, depending on how it is implemented, M4A could be welcome for larger health plans and their investors. Smaller plans and providers of administrative services would need to scramble to prove their worth to larger entities that may acquire them.

Can physicians practice in groups?

Physicians practicing in groups or independently might rethink their career choices if they have to rely exclusively on Medicare payments for their services. Many likely would seek to become employees of larger health systems, practice only concierge medicine or choose to retire.

image

Background: The Need For Fundamental Health Reform

Health Reform as Labor Market Policy: Key Effects For Workers

  • Fundamental reforms like M4A could greatly aid labor market outcomes for U.S. workers. The most obvious benefits would be higher wages and salaries, increased availability of good jobs, reduced stress during spells of job loss, better “matches” between workers and employers, and greater opportunity to start small businesses.
See more on epi.org

About The Author

  • Josh Bivens joined the Economic Policy Institute in 2002 and is currently EPI’s director of research. His primary areas of research include mac­roeconomics, social insurance, and globalization. He has authored or co-authored three books (including The State of Working America, 12th Edition) while working at EPI, has edited another, and has written numerous resea…
See more on epi.org

Endnotes

  • 1. Underinsurance includes coverage gaps throughout a year. 2. “Excess costs” typically refers to health care costs that are rising faster than other economic benchmarks, such as overall gross domestic product. The Congressional Budget Office, for example, defines excess costs as the percentage change in health care costs per beneficiary minus the percentage change in per capi…
See more on epi.org

References

  • Autor, David, and Anna Salomons. 2018. “Is Automation Labor-Displacing? Productivity Growth, Employment, and the Labor Share.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Conference Drafts, March 2018. Baker, Dean. 2015. Job Lock and Employer-Provided Health Insurance: Evidence from the Literature. AARP Public Policy Institute, March 2015. Banthin, Jessica. 2017. “Health Ca…
See more on epi.org

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9