Medicare Blog

who proposed the law aginst negotiating prescription druhs for medicare

by Prof. Queenie Reinger Published 2 years ago Updated 1 year ago
image

What is the Medicare prescription drug price negotiation Act?

Introduced in House (01/08/2019) Medicare Prescription Drug Price Negotiation Act of 2019 This bill requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies regarding prices for drugs covered under the Medicare prescription drug benefit. Current law prohibits the CMS from doing so.

Will drug negotiations deny Medicare beneficiaries access to prescriptions?

In TV ads, the pharmaceutical industry claims congressional plans to allow the federal government to negotiate drug prices in Medicare would deny beneficiaries’ access to medicines their doctors prescribe. Experts say that’s unlikely, and an inaccurate portrayal of recent legislation.

Will Republicans negotiate drug prices under Medicare?

Congressional Republicans have generally been opposed to allowing the Secretary to negotiate drug prices under Medicare and did not include this proposal in their drug price legislation, H.R. 19.

Should Medicare intervene in negotiations between manufacturers and plan sponsors?

But a clause in the statute authorizing Part D prohibits Medicare from intervening in the negotiation between manufacturers and plan sponsors and from publishing any information on rebates. Many policymakers and consumer advocates have called for a straight repeal of this noninterference clause.

image

What are the prospects for Medicare drug price negotiation?

Congressional Democrats are generally supportive of government negotiations on drug prices, as is the public, based on concerns about high and rising drug prices, particularly for new drugs with little or no competition. Many supporters would also like to apply budgetary savings from this proposal to pay for other health care priorities. But even among Democrats, support for this proposal is not universal, and it is not clear that current legislative proposals have sufficient votes to pass the House this Congressional session, given a narrower majority, and concerns about preserving incentives for innovation raised by some centrist Democratic lawmakers.

How would Medicare negotiate drug prices under H.R. 3?

The negotiation process applies to at least 25 (in 2024) and 50 (in 2025 and subsequent years) single-source brand-name drugs lacking generic or biosimilar competitors, selected from among the 125 drugs with the highest net Medicare Part D spending and the 125 drugs with the highest net spending in the U.S., which could include physician-administered drugs covered under Medicare Part B, along with all insulin products. Drugs that are new to market could also be subject to negotiation if their list price is greater than median household income and their projected spending would place them among the list of drugs with the highest spending under Medicare or the U.S. overall.

What has CBO said about the potential for savings from Medicare drug price negotiation under H.R. 3?

CBO estimated over $450 billion in 10-year (2020-2029) savings from the Medicare drug price negotiation provision in the version of H.R. 3 in the 116 th Congress, including $448 billion in savings to Medicare and $12 billion in savings for subsidized plans in the ACA marketplace and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. CBO also estimated an increase in revenues of about $45 billion over 10 years resulting from lower drug prices available to employers, which would reduce premiums for employer-sponsored insurance, leading to higher compensation in the form of taxable wages.

How much did the CBO save in 2021-2030?

1425, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Enhancement Act) estimated higher 10-year (2021-2030) savings of nearly $530 billion, mainly because the Secretary would negotiate prices for a somewhat larger set of drugs in year 2 of the negotiation program under H.R. 1425 than under the version of H.R. 3 that CBO scored (50 vs. 25 drugs; this change is incorporated in the current version of H.R. 3).

What is Medicare Part D?

Under the Medicare Part D program, which covers retail prescription drugs, Medicare contracts with private plan sponsors to provide a prescription drug benefit and gives plan sponsors authority to negotiate drug prices with pharmaceutical companies. The law that established the Medicare Part D benefit, which covers retail prescription drugs, ...

How long does it take for the HHS to lower drug prices?

The executive order, which also endorsed other proposals to lower drug prices, such as inflation caps, called for HHS to develop more specific proposals to lower drug prices within 45 days of the order’s issue date. In Congress, proposals to authorize the federal government to negotiate drug prices for Medicare and other payers appear ...

What are the principles of price negotiation?

The principles call for a policy that establishes clear criteria for which drugs to include in price negotiation , gives the HHS Secretary the requisite tools to negotiate a “fair” price, and creates incentives for manufacturers to participate in the negotiation process.

Who introduced the Medicare price negotiations bill?

Rep. Lloyd Doggett introduced a bill in March that would require Medicare drug price negotiations and actually establish a formulary for what drugs would be covered, or require the private Part D plans’ formularies to incorporate the negotiated prices. The bill was referred to committee; CBO has not analyzed it.

Who said "I don't think there will be any products that aren't on the formulary so to?

Scott Morton said under this proposal, “I don’t think there will be any products that aren’t on the formulary so to speak … unless something isn’t adding value.”

What is the H.R. 3 bill?

H.R. 3, “Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act,” would require the HHS secretary to negotiate prices for at least 25 brand-name drugs in 2024 and at least 50 in 2025 and later years – specifically drugs that don’t have generic or similar competitors. The drugs selected would come from a list of 125 drugs that account for the greatest national spending or Medicare spending, and the secretary must negotiate the price of insulin products.

How much would H.R. 3 decrease in drugs?

In an August paper on its simulation model, CBO said a policy like H.R. 3 would cause a 0.5% decrease in new drugs in the first decade, a 5% decrease in the second decade and 8% in the third decade. The admittedly “uncertain” estimate from CBO would amount to 59 fewer new drugs over 30 years.

When was H.R. 3 passed?

The leading legislative proposal now — H.R. 3 — passed the House in December 2019, but went nowhere in the Senate. It was reintroduced in April. It’s unclear if Democrats will include that proposal — or a different one on Medicare drug negotiation — in the broad reconciliation bill they are crafting. The Biden administration has backed the policy idea, though a proposal it released on Sept. 9 included very few specifics on how this should be done.

Should Medicare premiums go down?

The CBO says Medicare premiums and cost-sharing in Part D should go down, and drug prices in other countries should increase.

Who pays the negotiated prices?

Both Medicare and private insurers, if they chose to, would pay the negotiated prices.

Who would negotiate with drugmakers in Medicare?

Under H.R. 3, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) would be authorized to negotiate directly with drugmakers in the Medicare program for lower prices for up to 250 prescription drugs each year, including the 125 most costly drugs offered by Medicare Part D plans or sold anywhere in the commercial market.

What is Medicare drug price negotiation?

In a nutshell, it would allow the Medicare program to directly negotiate pharmaceutical prices with drugmakers. Negotiations could apply to either all Medicare-covered drugs or just the costliest ones.

How would price negotiation affect patients?

Negotiation that uses an upper limit based on international prices, such as the one proposed in H.R. 3, is expected to reduce costs for patients in Medicare Part D and the commercial market through lower beneficiary premiums and cost-sharing (cost-sharing for specialty drugs is generally based on a percentage of the list price). CBO estimates that H.R. 3 would reduce prices on these drugs between 57 percent and 75 percent.

How does H.R. 3 affect Medicare?

Negotiation that uses an upper limit based on international prices, such as the one proposed in H.R. 3, is expected to reduce costs for patients in Medicare Part D and the commercial market through lower beneficiary premiums and cost-sharing (cost-sharing for specialty drugs is generally based on a percentage of the list price). CBO estimates that H.R. 3 would reduce prices on these drugs between 57 percent and 75 percent.

How many drugs are eligible for negotiation?

Each year, the HHS secretary would select at least 50 drugs from among the up to 250 drugs eligible for negotiation. Drugs that are new to market may be eligible for negotiation if the wholesale acquisition cost, also called the list price, is equal to or greater than the U.S. median household income ($78,500 in 2020).

How much would the drug pricing negotiation reduce federal spending?

As proposed in H.R. 3, drug pricing negotiation would reduce federal spending by $456 billion and increase revenues by $45 billion over 10 years. This would include: an increase in government revenue from employers using savings from reduced premiums to fund taxable wage increases for their workers.

What percentage of drug sales are taxed?

If a drug is selected for negotiation and the manufacturer either does not participate in negotiations with the HHS secretary or does not reach agreement on a price, an excise tax of up to 95 percent of the drug’s sales, as reported by the manufacturer, would be imposed on the manufacturer.

When was Medicare Part D created?

When Medicare Part D was created by Congress in 2003 to provide prescription drug coverage (which began in 2006), the legislation prohibited the program from negotiating prices with pharmaceutical companies.

How much will Medicare cost in 2023?

Using projected premium costs for 2023 through 2029 from the 2020 Medicare trustees report, Neuman’s group found that the estimated $14.3 billion premium savings would result in a 9% reduction in 2023 in what beneficiaries would otherwise pay for Part D coverage. By 2029, that savings would grow to 15%. (The trustees report projected annual premiums of $440 in 2023 and $560 by 2029.)

How much is Part D insurance in 2021?

For 2021, the base premium for Part D is about $33 monthly ($396 for the year). However, the amount varies from plan to plan. And, certain beneficiaries get help covering their drug costs, while higher earners pay extra each month for coverage.

Is there public support for having the government do something about drug prices?

There is strong public support for having the government do something about drug prices.

Is there a guarantee that the price negotiations would pass?

There’s no guarantee that the price-negotiation proposal would make it through the full legislative process, given Democrats’ razor-thin majority in the Senate.

When was Medicare Part D passed?

When Medicare Part D was passed in 2003, lawmakers included the “non-interference clause,” which essentially prevents the federal government from stepping in to negotiate prescription drug prices. Allowing the drug companies and private plans to negotiate prices lets the market forces work and has made the Part D program largely successful and one of the more solvent parts of Medicare.

How long does it take for a drug to be approved by the FDA?

It currently costs millions of dollars and can take 10 to 12 years for a new drug to be approved by the FDA. Patients would also benefit from eliminating barriers to access like prior authorization and step therapy. This would also reduce spending on prescription drugs.

Is there a time when both federal and state jurisdictions have been more in control of American’s healthcare than?

There has never been a time when both federal and state jurisdictions have been more in control of American’s healthcare than it is today. Implementation of the Affordable Care Act is well in motion, and each state has considered how to address provisions of the federal law as it has …

Does price fixing work?

Price fixing by the government never works well. In regard to prescription drugs, it will come at the cost of the innovation of new drugs and life-saving treatments. Companies that invest in the research and development of new drugs have to be able to recoup that investment in order to continue funding such. Schemes to reduce the price of drugs make it harder for companies to do so, resulting in less capital for research and development of new drugs.

Which party supports drug pricing reform?

While the progressive wing of the Democratic Party supports drug pricing reform, several key centrist Democrats in both the House and Senate appear to be uncomfortable with particular aspects of the budget reconciliation bill, including a potential deal-breaker, namely the potential negative impact of drug price controls on the domestic pharmaceutical industry, as well as long-term patient access to new drugs.

How much will H.R. 3 reduce the cost of drugs?

A paper released in 2019 by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the proposed legislation, H.R. 3, would reduce global revenue for new drugs by 19%, leading to 8 fewer drugs approved in the U.S. between 2020 and 2029, and 30 fewer drugs over the next decade.

Is the $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation finalized?

The $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill hasn’t yet been finalized. But, in all likelihood it will contain a prescription drug pricing component. Ostensibly, this feature would yield cost savings that could be used together with tax increases to finance other items in the bill, such as measures to support action on climate change.

Does Medicare have a price negotiation process?

Nevertheless, the Administration has not outlined a specific process for either Medicare drug price negotiation, the creation of an assessment entity with power to influence public sector prices, or changes to Medicare Part D benefit design, leaving it up to Congress to sort out the details, including alterations to existing laws that only the legislative branch can amend.

Does Biden support non-interference clause?

For example, according to the July executive order, Biden supports a legislative change to the non-interference clause that would allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices. Specifically, Medicare would be able to negotiate the price of certain high-cost drugs that have little or no competition. The Biden Administration has even intimated that it would like to see a ceiling set for the launch prices of single source (branded) outpatient (Part D) drugs by referencing the average price of these pharmaceuticals in other developed countries.

What would a bill in Congress allow Medicare to do?

A bill in Congress would allow Medicare to use its bulk-purchasing power to negotiate lower drug prices. Big Pharma is not pleased

Who signed the letter against HR 3?

Earlier this year, Peters’ campaign saw a surge in donations from pharmaceutical company executives after he organized a letter with nine other Democratic lawmakers informing the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, that they opposed HR 3. Schrader and Rice co-signed the letter.

How much money did PhRMA raise in 2019?

Gage has been lobbying Congress on drug pricing issues and HR 3, according to ethics records. PhRMA raised more than $500m in 2019, and the organization is one of the top lobbying spenders in DC.

Why does Rice oppose drug pricing?

On Tuesday, Rice explained that she opposes the drug pricing measure because “I do not support advancing policies that are not fiscally responsible and jeopardize the bill’s final passage.”

Did Peters vote for HR 3?

It’s worth noting that Peters, Schrader and Rice all voted in favor of HR 3 in the previous Congress. Politico wrote in May that Peters “said he cast that vote knowing it had no chance of becoming law at the time. He said he supported it only to ‘start a conversation about lowering the cost of prescription drugs’.”

image
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9