Medicare Blog

why medicare for all would be better for patients and familes

by Jada Pfannerstill Published 2 years ago Updated 1 year ago

The case for Medicare for All is simple. It would cover everyone — period. Done right, it would lower costs, a lot, while letting us leverage health care dollars to respond to public health crises like the opioid epidemic, invest in disease prevention and modernize care delivery with telemedicine.

Full Answer

Is Medicare for all a good idea?

The case for Medicare for All is simple. It would cover everyone — period. Done right, it would lower costs, a lot, while letting us leverage health care dollars to respond to public health crises like the opioid epidemic, invest in disease prevention and modernize care delivery with telemedicine.

Is Medicare for all the answer to health care costs?

The truth is the opposite: Medicare for All would sharply reduce overall spending on health care. It can be thoughtfully designed to reduce total costs for the vast majority of American families, while improving the quality of the care they get. Over my career, I have witnessed the problems with our health care system firsthand.

What would Medicare for all mean for You?

Sanders’ Medicare for All would be a single, national health insurance program that would cover everyone living in the United States. It would pay for every medically necessary service, including dental and vision care, mental health care and prescription drugs.

What does Medicare for all look like?

Medicare for All looks very different from the way we pay for health care in the United States today. Under the current system, people get health insurance from a patchwork of different providers. Most workers buy into health care plans sponsored by their employers.

What are the benefits of Medicare for All?

Sanders' Medicare for All would be a single, national health insurance program that would cover everyone living in the United States. It would pay for every medically necessary service, including dental and vision care, mental healthcare and prescription drugs.

Would Medicare for All be the most beneficial health care system for family physicians and patients?

No: Medicare for All Would Cause Chaos and Fail to Control Health Care Costs. Am Fam Physician.

Why is Medicare for All better than a public option?

A public option would leave millions uninsured or underinsured. Only Medicare for All would mean no GoFundMe for health care costs, no more debt from medical care and no more medical bankruptcies. More than 40 million Americans are underinsured, meaning they are unable to afford to use their for-profit insurance.

Why should we have healthcare for all?

Providing all citizens the right to health care is good for economic productivity. When people have access to health care, they live healthier lives and miss work less, allowing them to contribute more to the economy.

What would medicare for all do to doctors?

If, as studies suggest, Medicare for All would free up roughly 5% of doctors' work hours currently spent on billing, allowing them to increase patient care, per-physician revenue could rise by between $39,816 and $157,412 annually.

How would Medicare for all affect healthcare workers?

The Truth of What Medicare for All Means for You: Under Medicare for All, “the number of registered nurse graduates will decline by more than 25% and the entire nurse workforce will shrink by 1.2 million registered nurses by 2050 relative to current projections,” according to the issue brief.

How Medicare for All would hurt the economy?

The real trouble comes when Medicare for all is financed by deficits. With government borrowing, universal health care could shrink the economy by as much as 24% by 2060, as investments in private capital are reduced.

What is Medicare for All or what is a public option?

Medicare for All is a government-run and government-funded healthcare coverage plan. It would eliminate the need for other health insurance. Public Option is a tax-funded or individually funded health coverage program. A person would opt-in to the program and other health insurance plans would be available.

Why is a public option good?

In particular, a public option's differing incentives and governance might allow it to elicit greater trust from consumers. That might make consumers more confident that a public option would provide good coverage and, thus, willing to pay higher premiums.

Why universal healthcare is good for America?

With universal coverage, you could lose your job and still be able to keep your doctor without a single interruption. Universal healthcare is a fiscally responsible system that facilitates more freedom, more health service and better outcomes.

Why should the US have free healthcare?

Most agree that if we had universal healthcare in America, we could save lives. A study from Harvard researchers states that not having healthcare causes around 44,789 deaths per year. 44,789 deaths per year means that there is a 40% increased risk of death for people who are uninsured.

What are the 3 goals of a healthcare system?

The Triple Aims are: (1) improving the quality of the care provided, (2) improving patient outcomes, and (3) reducing the cost of care [3].

What is Medicare today?

Medicare Today. Medicare is a program that benefits Americans who are age 65 or older or who have disabilities. The current program has two parts: Part A for hospital care and Part B for doctors’ visits, outpatient care, and some forms of medical equipment.

How much does Medicare cost?

The most pessimistic estimate of costs comes from a 2018 paper by Charles Blahous of the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, which put the 10-year cost of Medicare for All at about $32.6 trillion over current levels.

How much of healthcare costs go to administration?

According to the JAMA study, 8% of all health care costs in the U.S. went toward administration — that is, planning, regulating, billing, and managing health care services and systems. By contrast, the 10 other countries in the study spent only 1% to 3% of total costs on administration.

How many Americans have no health insurance?

Under the current system, approximately 29.6 million Americans have no health insurance, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Moreover, a 2020 study by The Commonwealth Fund concluded that another 41 million Americans — about 21% of working-age adults — are underinsured, without enough coverage to protect them from devastatingly high medical expenses.

Why are generalist doctors paid higher?

One reason health care prices are higher in the U.S. is that most Americans get their coverage from private insurers, and these companies pay much higher rates for the same health care services than public programs such as Medicare.

Is Medicare for All a universal health care plan?

However, no other nation currently has a system quite like the Medicare for All plan with virtually zero out-of-pocket costs for patients.

Is Canada a single payer country?

The single-payer health care system in Canada is probably closer to Medicare for All than any other national system. Under this system, the government provides health insurance coverage, but most of the actual care comes from private doctors and hospitals.

What is Medicare for All?

Most Americans agree that we need major changes to our health care system. But a competing public option and buy-in proposals would leave more than a 100 million Americans at the mercy of for-profit insurers. By building on the promises of the Affordable Care Act and incorporating the lessons learned from decades of public programs like Medicare and Medicaid, Medicare for All would ensure that everyone has access to the care they need, including primary care, reproductive health, mental health services, dental, vision and long-term care. Only Medicare for All can make that guarantee.

How does Medicare for All work?

Unlike a public option or a Medicare buy-in, Medicare for All would eliminate the need for the wasteful and unnecessary insurance companies that are focused on profiting from illness instead of keeping enrollees healthy. Hundreds of insurance companies and plans spend time and resources on denying coverage for needed care. Patients, providers and hospitals fight to get care – even crucial cancer treatments – covered. This wasteful system is a key reason administrative costs in the U.S. are more than double the average in other wealthy countries, with between a quarter and a third of our health care dollars spent on administrative functions. Under Medicare for All, doctors would provide the care a patient needs and then send the bill to Medicare. There would be no more patients or doctors haggling with insurers about what’s covered and what isn’t. Given that Medicare already has a track record for keeping administrative costs down – even as private insurance costs rise – Medicare for All could save more than $500 billion a year.

How much would Medicare save?

Even the Koch-funded Mercatus Institute estimates that Medicare for All would save $2 trillion over a decade. The Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) at the University of Massachusetts Amherst found the U.S. could reduce total health spending over a 10-year period by more than $5 trillion.

How many Americans are uninsured?

Further, around 30 million Americans remain uninsured, meaning they likely have unmet health care needs and face the risk of medical debt or bankruptcy when they get sick. A public option would leave millions still uninsured or unable to afford the care they need.

How many people are underinsured?

More than 40 million Americans are underinsured, meaning they are unable to afford to use their for-profit insurance. Because of this, far too many Americans must depend on GoFundMe or other forms of public begging to afford lifesaving care.

Why do people avoid going to the doctor?

Nearly half of all Americans report that they avoided going to the doctor when sick or injured in the past year due to cost, meaning that many Americans put off care rather than risk medical debt and even bankruptcy just to get the care they need. Earlier treatment would reduce the need for more expensive care later.

Is Medicare for All a public option?

Why Medicare for All, Not a Public Option, Is the Best Solution. Americans know that our health care system is broken, but they are often misled by competing claims about which reforms would improve their health care without increasing their costs or exploding the country’s health care spending. The reality is that Medicare for All is ...

What is Medicare for All?

Medicare for All is a proposed new healthcare system for the United States where instead of people getting health insurance from an insurance company, often provided through their workplace, everyone in America would be on a program provided through the federal government. It has become a favorite of progressives, ...

Who introduced the Medicare at 50 Act?

Lawmakers have introduced other Medicare expansion options, which would be much more limited than Medicare for All. Senators Debbie Stabenow (D- Michigan), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin) introduced the Medicare at 50 Act in February of 2019.

Why is universal healthcare important?

Pros. Universal healthcare lowers health care costs for the economy overall, since the government controls the price of medication and medical services through regulation and negotiation.

Is Medicare for All single payer?

Medicare for All is effectively single-payer healthcare. Single-payer health care is where the government pays for people’s health care. The new name just makes the concept more popular. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll found that 48% of people approved of single-payer healthcare, while 62% of people approved of Medicare for All.

Is Medicare for All the same as Obamacare?

The Affordable Care Act, commonly referred to as Obamacare, would also be replaced by Medicare for All. Medicare for All is actually more genero us than your current Medicare program. Right now, Medicareis for Americans 65 and older. They receive care, but they’re also responsible for some of the cost.

Does Sanders tax Medicare?

If you make more than $250,000 a year, or are in the top 0.1 % of household, Sanders’ tax to pay for Medicare for All would be a con for you. In addition, universal health care requires healthy people to pay for medical care for the sick. However, that is how all health insurance programs work.

Is HSA good for health?

Tips for Keeping Your Finances Healthy. A health savings account (HSA) may be a good option for younger people who are worried about potential healthcare costs. HSAs can greatly reduce monthly premiums. Whatever the outcome on Medicare for All, it is important to keep yourself physically and financially healthy.

Why did the ACA affect the US?

Because the ACA maintained the central place of job-based health insurance, millions of Americans were left exposed during the coronavirus recession. With a universal health care program like Medicare for All, health insurance would be a right instead of a job perk, and no one would have lost their insurance in the middle of the pandemic.

Is healthcare the most expensive in the world?

America's health care system is the most expensive in the world, accounting for nearly 18% of overall gross domestic product. It is also a business, which means that hospitals have to remain profitable to remain open, always conscious of the bottom line.

Will health insurance increase in 2020?

On the other side of the health care industry sits health insurance. With many patients avoiding care during the pandemic — elective or otherwise — insurance companies haven't had to fork over as many reimbursements, and as a result their profits appear to have increased in 2020.

What are the benefits of Medicare for All?

'Medicare for All': What would it really mean for healthcare stakeholders? 1 Although “Medicare for All” could reduce personal healthcare spending and administrative costs, overall government spending could increase significantly after accounting for costs currently borne by employers and individuals under commercial plans. 2 Hospitals in high-cost markets could struggle to make up for the loss of commercial insurance payments that amount to several times more than what Medicare pays for the same service. 3 Physicians would face increasing financial pressure to seek employment with hospitals, and the physician shortage would be exacerbated given the likelihood of greater demand for healthcare services under universal coverage.

Why are Americans interested in healthcare reform?

Another survey indicates the underlying reason for Americans’ interest in healthcare reform: 77% are concerned that rising healthcare costs will cause significant and lasting damage to the U.S. economy, and 45% believe a major health event could leave them bankrupt, according to a 2019 Westhealth/Gallup survey.

How much will M4A reduce healthcare spending?

He begins with the projection by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that personal healthcare spending will reach $3.86 trillion by 2022 and calculates that M4A would reduce national healthcare spending by about $93 billion annually. This figure comprises:

Can physicians practice in groups?

Physicians practicing in groups or independently might rethink their career choices if they have to rely exclusively on Medicare payments for their services. Many likely would seek to become employees of larger health systems, practice only concierge medicine or choose to retire.

Does Medicare for All reduce healthcare costs?

Although “Medicare for All” could reduce personal healthcare spending and administrative costs, overall government spending could increase significantly after accounting for costs currently borne by employers and individuals under commercial plans. Hospitals in high-cost markets could struggle to make up for the loss of commercial insurance ...

Is M4A good for health plans?

Overall, depending on how it is implemented, M4A could be welcome for larger health plans and their investors. Smaller plans and providers of administrative services would need to scramble to prove their worth to larger entities that may acquire them.

How much less does Medicare pay hospitals?

But Medicare pays hospitals about 40% less than private insurance for inpatient services and doctors about 30% less for their treatment, according to Charles Blahous, a senior research strategist at the conservative Mercatus Center at George Mason University and a former trustee for Social Security and Medicare.

What does private insurance pay for?

Private insurance payments provide the funding hospitals need to offer the care that Americans expect, said Chip Kahn, chief executive of the Federation of American Hospitals, which represents for-profit institutions.

Who proposed the lump sum budget for hospitals?

The House version, unveiled in late February by Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington, would establish an annual lump-sum budget for hospitals and other institutions, but pay doctors based on the services they provide.

Is Medicare for all a national coalition?

The renewed interest in Medicare for all has prompted the American Hospital Association, Federation of American Hospitals and American Medical Association to join a national coalition seeking to chill the growing fervor. Instead, they are pushing to strengthen employer-based policies, which currently cover roughly half of Americans.

Do Americans like to give up their health insurance?

CNN —. Americans generally don’t like the idea of giving up their private health insurance. Hospitals and doctors don’t want them to, either. Private insurers typically pay medical providers a whole lot more than Medicare and Medicaid.

Does Jayapal pay for hospitals?

To contain health care costs, Jayapal wants to pay hospitals under a so-called global budget system, which other developed countries use. So does Maryland, which has specified the amount of annual revenue hospitals can receive from Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers since 2014.

What percentage of Americans support Medicare?

Though the exact number depends on the poll and the way the question is asked, a slim majority of Americans— 51 percent —now support Medicare for All, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll. Many moderate Democrats and most conservatives remain staunchly opposed to any kind of single-payer plan.

Who is the proponent of single payer?

The main proponents of single-payer in the Democratic race, Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, have defended their plans against these attacks and more. And the fact is, many supporters of this plan don’t need all the details.

Why did Kate Hudson's mother quit McDonald's?

Hudson’s mother, who recently had to quit her job at McDonald’s because of poor health, now relies on a GoFundMe campaign to pay for her medical care. “My heart is constantly pounding, just kind of waiting for the other shoe to drop,” Hudson said—meaning, she’s dreading the day her mother gets sicker and dies.

Is Medicare for All the best way to stop the health care madness?

Medicare for All strikes many as the easiest way to stop the health-care madness, even if the political path to it isn’t yet clear. They’ve grown disgusted with the American health-care system and reached the conclusion that blowing up the system is the only way forward.

Is Susan Wood still working for Medicare?

This past June, she testified at a congressional hearing on universal health coverage. She now works full-time for Mass-Care, a Massachusetts-based nonprofit advocating for Medicare for All.

Is single payer health care free?

Single-payer health care, the kind that exists in Canada and some European countries, would make medical care free or nearly free for all Americans. Under some versions of these plans, private insurance would be eliminated, and all Americans would be covered under one, government-run plan, similar to Medicare.

Does Amy Wood have dentures?

Wood now has dentures, and they fit poorly. Her dental insurance only covers a new pair every five years. Throughout this saga, Wood was frustrated that her health insurance didn’t protect her from staggering bills and difficult choices. It felt like politicians didn’t care.

How would Medicare for All affect physicians?

Under the Medicare-for-All plan, private insurance would be eliminated and physicians who are in private practice would be paid on a fee-for-service basis through a national fee schedule, likely at the current Medicare rate or slightly lower. By eliminating the insurance industry, the plan would also eliminate one million jobs. The new fee schedule would be significantly lower than the current industry fee schedule, which means Medicare-for-All would likely lower physician incomes in a significant way, making a bad situation for physicians even worse.

Who introduced Medicare for All?

Senator Bernie Sanders recently announced his Medicare-for-All bill. This is basically the senate version of the congressional bill introduced by Pra mila Jaya pal. The bill would eliminate the insurance industry and much of the billing bureaucracy that exists today. It would provide health care coverage for everyone and eliminate copays ...

What are the six critical objectives that could improve quality while reducing the cost of healthcare?

There are six critical objectives that, if achieved, could improve quality while reducing the cost of healthcare by as much $1 trillion per year: 1. Provide universal health care by requiring all employers to provide health insurance for their employees.

What do liberals and moderates want?

Both liberal and moderate Democrats want a universal health care system that covers all Americans. They would like a single-payer system like Medicare-for-All or a combination of public and private payers that would cover everyone.

Is there an alternative to Obamacare?

There is an alternative to both Obamacare and Medicare-for-All. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., introduces the Medicare for All Act of 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, April 10, 2019. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) The Associated Press. Senator Bernie Sanders recently announced his Medicare-for-All bill.

Is Medicare for All the wrong path?

While it has good intentions, Medicare-for-All is the wrong path for the future of healthcare in America. We need a plan which brings universal healthcare to America, one that would improve quality, improve outcomes, expand competition and lower costs.

Will Republicans reduce the deficit?

Historically Republicans would like to reduce the federal deficit, and it is likely that they feel a more urgent need to do so with the passage of the tax cut of 2018 that is projected to increase the deficit. Efforts to reduce the federal deficit will likely in part focus on expenditures for Medicare and Medicaid.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9